About Us

Attorney Profiles

What Every Chemist Should Know About Patents

Patent Forms

US Patent Application Tips

Report from Washington

Plant Protection

Links to Resources

En Français

On the Lighter Side

Contact Us

 

Practical Tips for U.S. Patents and Patent Applications

How to Count Claims in U.S. Patent Application for Determining Filing Fee

The filing fee for a U.S. patent application includes a surcharge for the number of claims in the application in excess of 20. The U.S. claim counting method is different from the practice of other patent systems, such as the European Patent Office or the Japanese Patent Office. An applicant who translates into English a European or Japanese patent application, and files the translation as an application in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) may face a high surcharge due to the presence of multiple dependent claims in the application. Since the five-year strategic plan of the PTO provides for a steep increase in the claim surcharge, it is all the more important for applicants to manage the claim count in their U.S. patent applications according to U.S. guidelines.

The following illustration of claim counting is reproduced with permission from the section on “Patent Practice Tips,” authored by Le-Nhung McLeland on the Web site of the firm Armstrong, Westerman & Hattori, L.L.P. The illustration includes an example of incorrect multiple dependency in a claim, and how it can be corrected.

  Description of Claim Claim count
for that claim

Claim 1 Independent 1

Claim 2 Depends on “claim 1.” 1

Claim 3 Depends on “claim 1 or 2.” 2

Claim 4 Depends on “any one of claims 1-3.”  
  Note: Claim 4 is incorrectly multiple dependent, because a multiple dependent claim may not depend on another multiple dependent claim. In this case, claim 4 cannot depend on claim 3 which is already multiple dependent. Therefore, claim 4 must be amended to depend only on “claim 1 or 2”. In such amended form, claim 4 would count as two claims.  
  Claim 4, as amended to depend on “claim 1 or 2.” 2

Claim 5 Depends on “any one of claims 1-4.”  
  Note: Similarly to the case for claim 4, claim 5 must be amended to depend only on “claim 1 or 2.”  
  Claim 5, as amended to depend on “claim 1 or 2.” 2

Claim 6 Depends on “claim 3.” 2

  TOTAL NUMBER OF CLAIMS = 10

How to Determine the Term of Protection of a U.S. Patent

In 1994 the United States enacted legislation to make the changes in intellectual property law required for compliance with GATT/TRIPS (General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade/The Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights). This legislation changed the way in which the term of a U.S. patent (other than a design patent) is calculated. The patent term no longer ends 17 years after the date of issuance of the patent. Instead, the patent term is set to end 20 years after the effective filing date of the application from which the patent is issued. A transition was provided around the cut-off date of June 8, 1995, which complicates the determination of patent term.

  • If the application from which the patent issued was filed on or after June 8, 1995, the patent term begins on the patent issue date and ends 20 years after the effective filing date of the application. (If the application is a continuation or division of a prior application, then its effective filing date is the filing date of the earliest filed application in the chain of applications. If the application is the U.S. national stage of an international application filed in the PCT system, then its effective filing date is the international filing date.)

  • If the application from which the patent issued was filed before June 8, 1995, the term of the patent is the longer of: (a) the term as calculated under the old method (17 years from issue date), and (b) the term as calculated under the new method (20 years from effective filing date). This transition rule extends the term of a patent that was in force on June 8, 1995, if the term as calculated by the new method is longer than the term as calculated by the old method.

To add further complication, the term of a patent may be extended by a Patent Term Adjustment (PTA) to compensate for delays attributable to the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO), offset by any delays attributable to the applicant. The value of the PTA (expressed in terms of number of days added to the patent term) is printed by the PTO on the cover page of the patent. However, the actual expiration date of the patent is not provided by the PTO, and should not be determined without the help of a patent professional, in view of the potential complexity of the calculation.

For examples of patent term calculation, see pages 9 and 10 of “What Every Chemist Should Know About Patents”.

Return to Top of Page

 
National Inventors Hall of Fame

“I claim:
An optical waveguide comprising a cladding layer formed of a material selected from the group consisting of pure fused silica and fused silica to which a dopant material on at least an elemental basis has been added….”

U.S. Patent 3,659,915 to Robert D. Maurer, Peter C. Schultz, and Donald B. Keck, 1993 inductees, for fiber optics.